Completeness Axiom

Discuss the details of "Yet Another Introduction to Analysis " by Victor Bryant here.

Completeness Axiom

Postby wuyiquant_tobe » Sat Nov 10, 2012 9:46 am

Hi All,

Just need some clarification on the dentition of the axiom.In this book page 10, this axiom states that if L and M are non empty sets with l<=m for each l belong to L and m belong to M, then there exist a real number alpha such that alpah >=l for each l belong to L and alpha<=m for each m belong to M.

I think the clarification i need here is does the >= and <= means larger OR equal to AND smaller OR equal to, or does it mean larger and equal to AND smaller and equal to? According to my current understanding it should be the former not the latter, am I right or wrong on this?
Posts: 7
Joined: Mon Oct 29, 2012 1:13 pm

Re: Completeness Axiom

Postby mj » Mon Nov 19, 2012 8:16 pm

Site Admin
Posts: 1380
Joined: Fri Jul 27, 2007 7:21 am

Re: Completeness Axiom

Postby comorati1 » Thu Apr 13, 2017 7:29 pm

yup you are right mate :)
Posts: 3
Joined: Thu Apr 13, 2017 7:28 pm

Return to Yet Another Introduction to Analysis

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest